The Yachting Quotient
One dubious advance wrought by this age of analysis is the discovery that us common folk can’t be trusted to really understand ourselves through the simple application of our deductive powers, or should we say, through common sense. If we try to figure ourselves out, the theory goes, we would tend to fib, evade the truth, and end up more mixed up than when we started. A sly way to get around this deplorable lack of inner integrity is to trick ourselves into revealing our real selves. By asking just the right sort of leading questions, we can find out just what sort of person we are. Well, the problem with all this is that most of us really do know what sort of person we are, yet we still need someone to point out these personal characteristics that we’re most proud of or are most concerned about developing. Still, we can’t be told that as individuals we’re pretty OK; we have to discover it, or have it revealed to us. And that’s one reason why personality tests are so popular. Such tests can presumably unlock our should to reach the true heart of our personalities. It all smacks of mysticism really, as if our personalities were hieroglyphics just waiting for some clever psychologist to decipher.
The problem with all this is that although our tastes are varied, our motivations are hardly so. Everybody has insecurities, ambitions, or other virtuous or not so virtuous traits. Its not that these traits vary so significantly from person to person, but rather that we display them in different degrees dependent upon the specific interpersonal situation we find ourselves in. Thus, any psychological assessment which labels you kind, considerate, but sexually insecure doesn’t make sense unless you first take into account the situation that can evoke such behavior.
But who cares anyway? Psychological sleight of hand is fun and entertaining, and whether it is a fortune cookie or a multiphasic personality inventory, we like a little hocus-pocus to magically justify the reaffirming platitudes we always like to hear. Thus we offer the Yachting Quotient examination as a way of proving to you just what a swell person you are (as if you didn’t already know).
8. The magazine I consult most frequently for pertinent advice about love, marriage, and sexuality is:
10 . I normally know that I’d like to enter a long term relationship by the
Quiz Answers
Ok, now total up your score
1.(a)4,(b)6,(c)8,(d)2
2.(a)7,(b)8,(c)0,(d)1
3.(a)6,(b)7,(c)0,(d)0
4.(a)9,(b)9,(c)-5,(d)0
5.(a)5,(b)9,(c)-7,(d)6(e)-10
6.(a)7,(b)4,(c)8,(d)2
7.(a)0,(b)9,(c)0,(d)8
8.(a)8,(b)2,(c)0,(d)8(e)0
9.(a)0,(b)4,(c)4,(d)8
10.(a)5,(b)6,(c)4,(d)1
11.(a)-3,(b)3,(c)6,(d)5
12.(a)5,(b)7,(c)7,(d)-1(e)-5
If you scored between:
80-100 points
You are kind, considerate, but have some sexual insecurities. Your are shy at times, except when you’re boisterous, or when your Uncle Fred visits. You don’t particularly like ketchup on your french fries, and you like to date people who come from Krasnoturinsk, Russia, or thereabouts.
60-79 points
You have some sexual insecurities, but in general are kindly and considerate. You like to sleep late on Saturday, and you don’t like to eat crackers in bed. You can become fairly disturbed over broken dates, but nonetheless remain resolutely committed to your heterosexuality. You like to date people of the opposite sex.
below 60 points
You are considerate and kind, but from time to time you are sexually insecure. You don’t like putting ketchup on your dates, however edible underwear is fine when included with a balanced breakfast. You like to date people of homo-sapiens descent.